UW-Eau Claire administrator said to leave turmoil in his wake
Albert Colom’s past colleagues draw parallels, further outline pattern of abuse
More stories from Madeline Fuerstenberg
More stories from Clara Neupert
May 14, 2020
More stories from Bridget Kelley
This is an ongoing story. Read previous coverage here, here and here.
Courage and power. Ultimately, that’s what Heather Pearson said she gained from a phone conversation in mid-December 2018.
The call was with John Yancey. He’d been the assistant vice president for enrollment services at the University of North Florida, where Albert Colom worked before becoming vice chancellor of enrollment services at UW-Eau Claire. A colleague who had a friend at UNF gave Pearson his phone number.
“Consistently, (Colom) created what can only be called a hostile work environment and good people made difficult choices in order to survive,” Yancey wrote to Pearson later in an email.
Pearson already knew his story, she said, because what happened at UNF was happening at UW-Eau Claire.
An ongoing Spectator investigation highlights a pattern in Colom’s behavior. Current and former UNF and Oklahoma State University employees say Colom fires or forces people out in order to rebuild his department with staff loyal to him. And he is successful at gaining support from those who hire him.
After she got the first email from Yancey, Pearson gathered the other women from the admissions office who’d witnessed Colom’s behavior and shared what she’d learned.
“I think there was power in that understanding,” Pearson said of the stories that validated her experience.
Over the next few weeks, they received three more anonymous statements that Yancey forwarded from former and current UNF employees. The women gained more courage with each story they read.
“There’s that moment when you realize that what you’ve been witnessing at your own university isn’t something that you’re overreacting to; it isn’t something that you’re reading in to — it’s a very real experience,” Pearson said.
Although the Spectator has copies of the three anonymous statements, they are not being published because reporters cannot verify the authors.
University of North Florida
John Yancey met Colom in 1998. At first, the two got along.
“I met Albert when he was the director of admissions of (Florida Atlantic University),” Yancey said in an interview last week, “and I have to tell you that initially I liked Albert a lot. I thought he was funny. I thought he was kind of charismatic and flippant in a way, at that point and time, I thought a harmless way. And he was just someone who was fun to be around and hang with.”
Yancey said he was part of the hiring process when Colom applied to be the associate vice president for enrollment services at UNF in 2013. Midway through the process, many administrators, including John Delaney, the president of the university, received an anonymous email. Yancey said it warned them about Colom, calling him a “horrible man” and to “watch out.” Delaney chose to ignore the email because it was anonymous, Yancey said. Colom started his job at UNF in the summer of 2014.
Yancey’s phone buzzed in his pocket. It was Sept. 12, 2014, and he was on stage presenting on behalf of UNF at an event. He ignored the call, finished his presentation and answered audienced questions. Then Yancey stepped outside of the building to check his phone.
He had a missed call from Colom. Yancey dialed his cell.
“Hey, what’s going on?” Yancey asked Colom.
Colom wanted to fire the university registrar, the director of enrollment services technology and the assistant director of enrollment services, marketing and publications. Yancey asked why. They were “all against him,” Colom responded.
They met later that day to discuss Colom’s plan. The meeting took several hours. Yancey said he was just trying to understand Colom’s reasoning. Colom was frustrated because higher ups told him he couldn’t fire the registrar or the director of enrollment services technology. But, he could fire the assistant director of enrollment services, marketing and publications.
The assistant director was a young, single mother, Yancey said. She wasn’t the best hire, he admitted, but she was new and coachable. Colom didn’t care.
“I’m not investing anything in her,” Yancey recalled Colom saying. “She’s gone tomorrow.”
Listen to Yancey describe what happened next.
“He said, um, he said John, how many people have you fired? I said Albert, I’ve been in this business here at UNF for 16 years now, and I’ve probably fired 10 to 11 people. I said that every time I fired a person, I lost sleep the night before because I knew that, even though firing them was the right decision from a business standpoint, there was a human cost to that decision. And these people had mortgages and families and bills and car payments and food to put on the table and the action I was going to take that next day was going to negatively impact that. And from a human standpoint, I lost sleep every time.
And and I’ll never forget it: He looked at me — and I hope you’ll please excuse my language — he looked at me and said: ‘John that’s why you’re a p – – – – and you’ll never be anything in this business.’”
The next day, Yancey said, Colom fired the assistant and told her she had to clear out her desk and leave campus immediately. Colom told the HR rep to help her pick up her things and walk her to her car.
A cake waited at her desk, Yancey said. It was her birthday.
This is not how UNF employees are usually fired, Yancey said. Only in extreme circumstances are people escorted from campus immediately, and this was not a situation that warranted that approach, he added.
“He was sending a message to everybody else,” Yancey said. “Get her a box, clean her desk, walk her out in front of everybody in her office — everybody knows — down the stairs and to her car. This was not, again, as much as what he did, you know as much as it was ‘Let me make a show. Let me show you I’m the big dog in the yard. And if you don’t, you know, fall in line: this is you next.’”
At this point, Yancey said, he was beginning to get fed up, but he stayed as long as he could in his position. He was constantly arguing with Colom, who wanted him fired.
Yancey went to UNF President Delaney with staff testimonies and laid out the situation. Delaney said he was giving Colom some room to shape the department. Yancey told Delaney he wanted to tender his resignation, but Delaney resisted. Yancey took a different position within the university.
Word of Colom’s behavior followed Yancey to his new role. He heard about Colom’s “vindictive bullying” from coworkers. The stories started to take an emotional toll on Yancey, who felt he’d deserted his colleagues.
Years later, Yancey now says he was naive for trusting the hiring process that brought Colom to UNF. After he spoke to Pearson on the phone in January 2019, he typed up what he knew about Colom.
“I am writing this to you because I fear the same thing will happen or (likely) is already happening at UWEC,” Yancey said in his email. “If he is already targeting you, he views you as a threat.”
Bowling Green State University
Colom worked at Bowling Green State University from January 2009 to June 2014.
The Spectator called current and former members of the enrollment management staff and admissions staff at BGSU several times. At the time of publication, no one from BGSU had agreed to speak on the record.
A Spectator reporter reached Janice Varney-McKnight, senior administrative assistant for enrollment management, who declined to comment and hung up when the reporter asked why.
Varney-McKnight was Colom’s administrative assistant when he was at BGSU. She has been in her position at BGSU since 1996.
Oklahoma State University
When Colom accepted the position of vice president for enrollment management at Oklahoma State University in January of 2006, it wasn’t long before he started making changes.
“One of the first things he did was to tell the director of admissions he needed to find a new job,” Joan Payne, then an associate registrar at Oklahoma State, wrote in a statement she gave to the Spectator on March 13, 2019. “Paul Carney was the director of admission at the time. He was told to leave within the first month of Colom arriving at OSU.”
Payne originally contacted the Spectator in March 2019 shortly after five members of the UW-Eau Claire Admissions staff quit in tandem and allegations against Colom were first beginning to surface. Reporters contacted Payne again in mid-February 2020 for updates.
Payne worked in the registrar’s office at Oklahoma State for over 24 years before resigning in June of 2006 because of Colom’s toxic treatment. She said she always thought she would retire from that position.
As Colom’s department emptied, he acted to rebuild with lieutenants from his previous institution, Florida Atlantic University, Payne said. One, Donna Mitchell, joined him in admissions shortly after his arrival. A second co-worker, Karen Lucas, has worked at the same university as Colom on three occasions.
Lucas was immediately named the director of Oklahoma State admissions following Carney’s departure.
Another Oklahoma State employee of 30 years, Payne recounted, was removed from her administrative position and assigned to work at a counter as “basically a clerk.” Colom told her it would be her new job to be the “pretty lady at the counter” and smile, Payne wrote.
“The stress of this took a toll on her,” Payne said. “She was on sick leave for a year and then came back and retired. She could not work under those conditions.”
Payne said Colom made quick work of restructuring the registrars and admissions offices. She said he had a “total disregard” for university and state regent policies.
Linda Owens, then the associate director of admissions at Oklahoma State, said Colom often questioned the rules and policies set by Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.
“After continually trying to explain processes in Admissions, which were based on Regents policy,” Owens wrote in a written statement provided to the Spectator, “he basically asked me why we ran so scared of the Regents and that we were going to have to learn to ‘bend the rules.’ He told me that we answered to him, not to the Regents.”
Within Colom’s first few weeks at Oklahoma State, Payne said he gathered all the registrar employees and told them they were not doing their jobs correctly. He said everyone’s job would be changing, then charged Payne with reorganizing and assigning employees to new positions.
After three months of working under Colom, Payne knew she could not work with him and implement the changes he wanted to make in the registrar’s office. She said he was a bully who created a hostile workplace.
“It began to take a toll on me — healthy, mentally, emotionally,” Payne wrote in her statement. “I could not treat my staff in the manner he wanted.”
Payne left her job in the registrar’s office and took an academic advising position with the College of Arts and Sciences. Leaving her position cost her half of her salary.
Since her departure, Payne said the registrar’s office has still not recovered from Colom’s presence.
“The people he put in place — registrar, associate registrar and admissions leadership — are not empathetic or concerned about policy and procedure,” Payne wrote. “They are definitely not student oriented. Staff in both offices are not treated as valuable members of the office and feel demeaned.”
Owens, similarly, was “tasked with eliminating experienced, qualified staff” to make Colom’s new organizational plans work. Owens said the pressure to do so drove her to seek medical help as she struggled with sleeping and eating. She likened her emotions at the time to “an elephant sitting on her chest.”
In her statement, Owens said the doctor prescribed her with medication “just to function.” Owens ultimately stepped down from her position in admissions and took a job as an academic counselor. She took a $15,000 decrease in salary. Owens stayed in that position for nine years before retiring in 2015.
According to Owens, Colom was “removed from his job” by the university president, V. Burns Hargis, in 2009. The Spectator called and emailed Hargis to request an interview. He declined to comment.
UW-Eau Claire
UW-Shared Services’ investigation into allegations against Colom began this week.
In a statement released Wednesday, Chancellor James Schmidt said he can’t comment on personnel matters. He sent the email to staff, faculty and news media after more than a week of refusing to speak publicly about the matter. Schmidt encouraged the campus community to be patient with the investigation. He urged staff to cooperate fully with the investigation without fear of retribution.
In his two media statements since allegations about Colom became public on Feb. 13, Schmidt has referred to Angela Swenson-Holzinger’s complaint as the “first official complaint.”
This contrasts with Heather Kretz’s two reported meetings, once in 2018 and again on Jan. 4, 2019, when she placed a folder on Chancellor James Schmidt’s desk. Inside were the four stories from UNF. Kretz said Schmidt told her he wouldn’t read them. Much like UNF president Delany told Yancey he wanted to give Colom “room to shape the department,” UW-Eau Claire Chancellor Schmidt said he “needed to stand by his person.” Kretz resigned from her position as director of admissions the next week.
Just over a year since leaving UW-Eau Claire, Pearson said she hopes her voice will prevent Colom from bullying employees in the future.
“To be honest, it gave us a lot of courage, just reading those statements,” Pearson said, “to know that we had to go forward and try to prevent this from happening at UW-Eau Claire, but even more so, to try to prevent this from happening to other people in the future.”
This is an ongoing story.
Madeline Fuerstenberg is a fourth-year journalism student. This is her eighth semester on The Spectator staff and she’ll miss it with all her heart once she graduates (if she graduates).
Neupert is a fourth-year journalism student at UW-Eau Claire. She is the executive producer of Engage Eau Claire on Blugold Radio Sunday. In her spare time, Neupert's working on becoming a crossword puzzle expert.
Bridget Kelley is a fourth-year journalism student. Bridget enjoys hanging out with babies, coffee and oxford commas. If anyone has any gluten-free food suggestions, Bridget's inbox is open.
Aaron Luther • Feb 28, 2020 at 6:33 pm
Worked under Albert four years ago and this article absolutely captures who he is… You might thinks he’s just doing things the “corporate way”, but there’s a level of incompetence to the way he ran things. When you reward loyalty more than competence, when you treat hard working people with disrespect and hostility – that’s incompetence
Anonymous Alum • Feb 28, 2020 at 10:03 am
Has anyone ever noticed that UWEC, under Schmidt’s leadership, rarely hires women for key leadership roles? As a follow-up, the Spectator should take a deep dive into the hires conducted by Schmidt (dean-level or higher). He has never selected an internal female candidate for those roles, despite several quality choices available (strong internal female candidates were finalists for Dean of Students and Athletics Director, among others). The females in his leadership team were almost all inherited from the prior administration. Schmidt almost always selects an external male candidate for leadership. Wonder why that is?
Concerned • Feb 28, 2020 at 7:02 am
^^^ A clear attempt to smear John Yancey with lies. Whoever wrote that is a clown.
UNF Employee • Feb 26, 2020 at 8:30 am
As someone who worked under Albert Colom at UNF, I can attest to everything John Yancey said. I kept my head down and didn’t make waves, but I watched good employees let go. Their only crime was voicing alternative strategies to Mr. Colom’s ideas. Employees he didn’t like were put in no win scenarios where they could never meet the expectations, he placed on them. Soon he ran out of dissenters and it just became scapegoats getting fired, as he continued lead UNF into the bottom of the Florida state metric rankings.
John Yancey doesn’t need this support, but he was beloved by both male and female employees under him. The only office he didn’t get along with was the financial aid office. The director of Financial aid rode Mr. Colom’s coat tails and created a huge, bloated, and inefficient office where she consolidated power. John Yancey tried keeping her honest due to the number of accounting mistakes and processing errors her staff made, all the while trying to hide all of it from other offices. If anyone would have bothered to take a shot at him and defend Albert, from UNF, it would be her.
Ozzie Osprey • Feb 24, 2020 at 7:09 am
As someone who worked as UNF before Albert Colom showed up and still works there now long after he has left, let me attest if John Yancey is your key witness, you aren’t properly vetting your sources. Yancey is/was a bully, a misogynist, and an all-around monster. I wouldn’t trust a word he says. He was scorned from the day Albert showed up at UNF because he wanted that job and Albert got it instead. He had it out for him from day one. John always showed favoritism toward some employees and contempt toward everyone else. He is not to be trusted or listened to in the least.
Blugold Alum • Feb 22, 2020 at 6:35 pm
I am so incredibly disappointed in this Chancellor and I have lost all faith in him as a leader! He has allowed Colom to reek havoc over, arguably, the most important department in the University. He did not listen to, much less respect excellent, long-standing employees when presented with obvious evidence of a serious problem, one that might have been contained if his inflated ego hadn’t clouded his judgement. Schmidt’s lack of transparency and poor decision-making skills in this instance are inexcusable. Both Colom and Schmidt should resign immediately!
David • Feb 22, 2020 at 10:21 am
What’s also horrifying about all of this is that I’m sure plenty of middle aged white men don’t see anything wrong with his behavior. No one has held them accountable before, and I’m super proud of these staff members and journalists that are speaking up. If success in holding these kinds of people accountable to their terrible behavior can be achieved on this scale maybe it will happen on a national level too.. Hoping the university will do something soon, they never listen to students and staff only the executives and the $$$$
Peter Werner • Feb 22, 2020 at 7:02 am
This is impressive journalism accomplished by talented, courageous student reporters. Would that professional news organizations display the same tenacity, persistence and thoroughness that these young women are showing. I am thankful for this example of the student press shining the light of truth onto a situation that is in dire need of it.
Blugold_Alumna • Feb 21, 2020 at 12:43 pm
Once again I am impressed by the research and reporting done by these young women journalists.
That said, I am disappointed that Schmidt has not called for Colom’s resignation. The ugly truth about Colom is out in the open.
Schmidt ignored & allowed bullying of long-term, integral employees. Why should anyone trust him to do his best for UW-EC’s students? Why would donors continue to give to an institution lead by a chancellor w/o the courage to intervene when he first learned about the wrong-doing?
Colom AND Schmidt need to go!
Conor • Feb 21, 2020 at 11:32 am
The incompetence and lack of follow through of the current UWEC administration to do the proper vetting and interviewing of this candidate should put the Chancellors position in jeopardy and at the very least, intense scrutiny. The lack of empathy, leadership, or vision shown by the Chancellor when an employee brought this issue to his literal desk is clearly the sign of someone looking the other way( Penn State, Michigan State, USC, etc.) and we all have seen how looking the other way during these types of college or business situations can cause a massive fallout for the colleges, communities and individuals who were the victims in these situations. At best, the Chancellor looked the other way during this or at worst, he was incredibly incompetent in being a “leader” on campus or having any type of sense of the deterioration of culture and moral occurring in his own staff and his administration. If the Spectator would want to reach out to an Alumni of the school on their perspective, I would be more than willing to discuss.
Conor • Feb 21, 2020 at 11:25 am
This is incredible journalism, please continue to press forward and be the truth through thorough reporting, within the UWEC and Eau Claire community to hold leaders and people accountable for their actions.
Past Employee • Feb 21, 2020 at 10:23 am
Although I hate remaining anonymous, I still work in Wisconsin so need to protect myself. First, let me commend the Spectator and student reporters. You are the future of journalism, and the truth you are exposing (not the fallacy of “both sides”) is important.
Second, what disturbs me most about this story is the way outstanding employees were allegedly treated, not just by Albert Colom, but by Chancellor Schmidt. We all have encountered leadership changes, and we know it can be tense and challenging. What is described here is dysfunction at another level. It is systemic dysfunction. It appears to be an HR and Affirmative Action mechanism that is more interested in protecting the institution than in serving the human capital – discouraging complaints, encouraging silence, dividing and conquering women especially, gaslighting. It is a campus leadership hellbent on making a national name for itself, rather than being a great, proud, regional campus – as a result, approaching new hires with blinders. Most disappointing, it is a senior leader (chancellor) who would put the entire institution’s enrollment at risk to defend his choice of a new hire. He appears to have ignored the word of his most loyal, competent Admissions Staff (known as the best in the state) and trusted the word of an unproven new person. To do otherwise, of course, would cast his hiring decision as a mistake, and call his leadership into question.
Instead, now we have a situation where his leadership IS called into question, because in addition to losing the entire middle management of his main tuition-generating arm of his campus, he has put the campus at risk for: gender-based lawsuits; loss of fundraising (I have already read about one person cancelling their contribution); inability to fill key leadership positions in those areas; loss of respect in professional circles in those areas (in addition to the areas in Blugold Central where leadership is unprepared in their profession); continued unfavorable media scrutiny. It’s a mess.
The bottom line: (allegedly) the chancellor did not believe these women. It happens over and over and over in all spheres of life. He did not believe them. Or he did but he did not care enough to do anything. Which is worse?
Former Blugold • Feb 21, 2020 at 8:48 am
Another great segment from our students. It’s astounding that they can find out this information but the search committee for Mr. Colom’s position could not? It tends to be a red flag when a candidate’s past contains several lateral moves. But it appears as if UWEC had stars in their eyes, based on his prior institutions. But they should have done their due diligence. Clearly, they – or the search firm – did not. Another red flag? Mr. Colom has no social media presence. Any administrator worth their salt has at least a LinkedIn profile, if not a Twitter feed. Is there a reason for his hiding? Even if half of what these previous employees said is true, it’s bad. Several individuals dropped the ball here: the search firm, the search committee, and the hiring manager. And several good people suffered as a result of ego and greed.
Andy Cohen • Feb 21, 2020 at 8:42 am
This is great writing, and real journalism. Thank you.