The Faceoff: Should professional athletes be required to attend college?
Two members of The Spectator debate on the controversial topic
More stories from Parker Reed
More stories from Gabriel Lagarde
tes Yes
Professional athletes should be required to attend at least one year without question.
The main reason for this is high school athletes are not emotionally ready to make the jump right to the pros.
Eighteen-year-old men and women are not ready to handle themselves independently, make a professional living and, all too often, high school programs don’t offer an atmosphere that can compare to college or the pros on any level.
These athletes are often emotionally not mature yet, and that can manifest itself in a bad way in a professional organization.
If athletes are allowed to declare early on in their lives for the pros, that puts them in a tough position.
Unless the athlete is the next Lebron James or Kobe Bryant, most likely the athlete will ride the bench for at least a year or two and they will not develop as quickly as a player.
On top of that, with this new-found wealth and fame, an athlete coming straight out of high school is more prone to act out and get into trouble off of the playing field (and possibly hinder their ability to succeed).
College offers athletes a chance to prove themselves from a maturity standpoint as well as on the field of play. The ability to manage time and resources is a skill that college teaches student athletes and will help the player make the transition to the pros more easily.
The National Basketball Association (NBA) and the National Football League (NFL) are becoming the trailblazers for the movement to require universal college requirement in order to declare for the pros.
Unless we want to expose high school graduates to the harsh real world realities that the pros bring too early, then at least a required year or two of college to declare for the pros is the way to go.
-Parker Reed, Sports Editor
No
At face value, it doesn’t make sense to throw high school kids into the pros.
No matter how talented these athletes are, they’re immature and not accustomed to primetime. We’re talking about individuals who will make executive-level money from the moment they step into the arena. Some will be paid like Fortune 500 CEO’s, essentially for playing a game for a third of the year. Why not give them a couple years to prove themselves? Their time will come.
But, the simple fact of the matter is that we rarely give sports like football or basketball credit for how brutal and demanding they are.
According to the NFL Players Association, the average NFL career only lasts about 3.3 years. Studies indicate the average NBA career is roughly twice that. The vast majority of athletes aren’t going to be paid like a Pro-Bowler or All-Stars.
To put it plainly, the chances than an athlete will enter their fifties with permanent and debilitating injuries are astronomically higher than their chances to achieve the kind of superstar lifestyle men like Tom Brady or LeBron James enjoy.
Still, there are droves of kids who aspire to be professional athletes, and they won’t be dissuaded, no matter how many cautionary tales are thrown their way. The NBA and the NFL treat the college level as their equivalent to the minor leagues in baseball: a means to foster, evaluate and weed out talent. However, unlike the MLB’s minor leagues, college athletes are not compensated.
Between 2011-2012 alone, the Alabama Crimson Tide football program spent over $36 million and accrued nearly $82 million in revenue — but the heart and soul of the program, the student athletes, didn’t see a dime. These football players work and sacrifice their bodies in a way that profits their universities millions, yet they’re treated little better than indentured servants as a reward.
For all but the luckiest few, the world of sports is a brutal and unforgiving one. For every happy ending there are a hundred sob stories. Requiring athletes to spend a year or two in the college ranks wastes some of their prime years, especially for those who play physically demanding positions, such as running back. For others, their careers will end before they have a chance to begin, as quickly as it takes to tear ligaments or crush a spinal cord.
Instead of taking advantage of college kids — as the NCAA is an organization that perpetuates these kinds of abuses— athletes should get back what they put in, even if it’s for only a fleeting moment in the limelight.
-Gabriel Lagarde, Freelance Writer
capper • Mar 30, 2023 at 11:50 am
pretty mid nfc
Ammon Zogg • Apr 22, 2022 at 12:04 pm
A good source for my opinion essay on why a pro athlete to have a college digree
Ethan Asimakis • Sep 15, 2021 at 6:28 pm
I totally agree with being obligated to go to school for at least one year. My reasoning for this is these teenage athletes are not ready for that type of money and that type of criticism and with a brain that is not fully developed it is hard to succeed in leagues with athletes that are mentally and physically stronger than them. A notable example of why you should go to college before going to play professionally is the sad story of NBA superstar potentiated player Sebastian Telfair. The truly devastating story starts with Sebastian playing at an unbelievable level in High School. The idea of college was still heavily in favor of going to the NBA and he was looking into offers from huge schools like UNC, Clemson, Duke, etc. But where this story takes a terrible turn is when his mom gets sick, and he forces himself to go to the NBA and get the NBA paycheck he deserved. Everything went down after he joined the NBA and paid for his mom’s house and health, some of his coaches went as far to say he was not mentally ready, and they felt like the money and the comfortablility changed him. Therefore, I believe one year in college is most beneficial towards the athlete and should be enforced by coaching across America.
John Hatfield • Feb 1, 2024 at 10:59 am
Endentured servants?? We will agree to disagree. They get plenty. More than any student in the university. Most are strapped with huge debt. They get a free education but truly don’t want it. So no they shouldn’t have to go. Let them try for the NFL. Welcome to life isn’t fair. They are almost all very pampered and told how good they are. When they aren’t they tuck tail and run. Pathetic
somebody • Oct 30, 2020 at 9:15 am
at one point they do argue
anonymous • Oct 30, 2020 at 9:04 am
yea same stand point
anonymous • Oct 30, 2020 at 9:03 am
pros not prod lol
anonymous • Oct 30, 2020 at 9:03 am
yeah they are on the same stand point of this article and i think they should finish college before the pros and they should invest while in the prod for a backup plan
anonymous • Oct 30, 2020 at 9:02 am
yeah they are on the same stand point of this article and i think they should finish college before the pros
anonymous • Oct 29, 2020 at 10:58 am
yes i think they should go to college and it is weird that they both give the same point of view they need to argue about it not agree. btw i think that they should also start a company before entering the nfl because they could fail and not earn anything but they can earn more money if they start the company and they will have a backup plan after the pros
anonymous • Oct 29, 2020 at 10:24 am
yes i think they should go to college and it is weird that they both give the same point of view the need to argue about it not agree
nathan smith • Oct 27, 2020 at 10:50 am
i think yes but do should they finish college or just do a year of college
Eben Nevils • Feb 13, 2020 at 8:43 pm
Both of the people are on the same stand point even though they are supposed to be opposing each other.